I’m a little behind on this but the bookforum homepage is a blog complete with an rss feed (their archives date to May 2007). Also, it’s not bad!
Fresh Links!
Previous post: Fresh Links!
I’m a little behind on this but the bookforum homepage is a blog complete with an rss feed (their archives date to May 2007). Also, it’s not bad!
Previous post: Fresh Links!
{ 6 comments }
It’s kind of a weird blog. It’s as if they’re trying to make up for being print-only for so long that each post is an explosion of highlighted links going hither and yon. I say “they,” it’s clearly one obsessive person doing it, but who? Eric Banks? (Probably not.)
It’s kind of a weird blog. It’s as if they’re trying to make up for being print-only for so long that each post is an explosion of highlighted links going hither and yon. I say “they,” it’s clearly one obsessive person doing it, but who? Eric Banks? (Probably not.)
I wondered who’s doing it too. It reminds me of things magazine in its obsessive link collections, which is why I responded to it. Also Things is a one man team thing too.
I wondered who’s doing it too. It reminds me of things magazine in its obsessive link collections, which is why I responded to it. Also Things is a one man team thing too.
I should add that I don’t always like five million links in one post, since it’s pretty hard to read, but some people really do have a skill with such things. I suppose “not bad” should really be read relative to artforum.com, which I find actively bad. I haven’t been reading bookforum long enough to definitely say I like it.
I should add that I don’t always like five million links in one post, since it’s pretty hard to read, but some people really do have a skill with such things. I suppose “not bad” should really be read relative to artforum.com, which I find actively bad. I haven’t been reading bookforum long enough to definitely say I like it.
Comments on this entry are closed.