![Thumbnail image for The Affect of Animated GIFs (Tom Moody, Petra Cortright, Lorna Mills)](http://artfcity.com/wp-content/themes/thesis_17/lib/scripts/thumb.php?src=http%3A%2F%2Fartfcity.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2018%2F07%2Fwpid-1252955687McKayOptiDiscs2-250x155.gif&w=180&h=112&zc=1&q=100)
Since the early 1990s, artists have chosen the internet as a medium, an environment and a
forum. While some internet artists also maintain a gallery practice, the conditions and
conventions that inform meaning in online art remain in many ways distinct from those of
the off-line artworld. Internet art — inherently ephemeral and infinitely reproducible —
eludes commodification and largely operates independently of the art market.1 In the
online environment where acts of creative self-expression are the norm, the boundaries
between artists and not-artists that confer status and hierarchy in the gallery and museum
system are largely immaterial. Even among niche groups of online practitioners who self-
identify as artists, the culture of internet art regards the agency of the viewer on a par
with that of the artist. In most cases, viewers are also producers. Many online artists, such
as myself, operate through the medium of the blog format, which allows for a hybrid
practice blending art production with art criticism, cross-promotion and dialogue.