Sculpture Controversy, Pt. 2 – Chicago Art Blog
A great summary of the debate around J. Seward Johnson’s giant American Gothic sculpture in Chicago. Update: Link to Google Cache.
Sculpture Controversy, Pt. 2 – Chicago Art Blog
A great summary of the debate around J. Seward Johnson’s giant American Gothic sculpture in Chicago. Update: Link to Google Cache.
Previous post: Curators Francesco Bonami and Gary Carrion-Murayari Announce Whitney Biennale Artists
Next post: Fresh Links!
{ 8 comments }
the link seems to be broken.
the link seems to be broken.
Dead link–I only find one post for the “Chicago Art Blog”–a “this is my first post” type excitementfest. Damn, I hate media-hosted blogs with all their crappy navigation issues, tags connecting you to content you don’t care about, and search engines that coudn’t pull up “Seward Johnson” or “American Gothic” if they were on fire.
Dead link–I only find one post for the “Chicago Art Blog”–a “this is my first post” type excitementfest. Damn, I hate media-hosted blogs with all their crappy navigation issues, tags connecting you to content you don’t care about, and search engines that coudn’t pull up “Seward Johnson” or “American Gothic” if they were on fire.
they removed the post for some reason. here’s the google cache
http://74.125.93.132/search?q=cache:pIMAo_jK2tUJ:www.chicagonow.com/blogs/chicago-art-blog/2009/12/sculpture-controversy-pt-2.html+http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/chicago-art-blog/2009/12/sculpture-controversy-pt-2.html&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a
they removed the post for some reason. here’s the google cache
http://74.125.93.132/search?q=cache:pIMAo_jK2tUJ:www.chicagonow.com/blogs/chicago-art-blog/2009/12/sculpture-controversy-pt-2.html+http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/chicago-art-blog/2009/12/sculpture-controversy-pt-2.html&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a
Maybe Ritchie (the blogger) removed it himself because it’s such a tepid non-defense of the indefensible.
Maybe Ritchie (the blogger) removed it himself because it’s such a tepid non-defense of the indefensible.
Comments on this entry are closed.