This Week in Bad Photography: Guggenheim Fellows!

by Paddy Johnson on May 1, 2009 · 17 comments Reviews


Suzanne Opton, Soldier Birkholz

Is the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial fellowship prestigious any more?  I’m asking because the foundation announced its list of 180 fellows this year, and judging from a post up at American Photo, more than a few of the recipients produce very clichéd work.  Probably the best example of this comes from Suzanne Opton, who photographs the heads of American soldiers in between tours in Iraq and Afghanastan at Fort Drum.  As part of the series, she also documents Iraqis who fled to Jordan since the invasion and turns these images into billboards.  However, in order to produce an “emotional” picture, she uses the visual language of theatre and all the contrivances of fine art portrait photography.  The result is a suite of photographs better suited for the cover of an electro-beat album than another billboard project.


Osamu James Nakagawa, Series consists of 17 images + DVD, 2003—2005, Archival inkjet print on paper, Triptychs: 11″ X 40″, others: 30″ X 40″ and 30″ X 60″

Osamu James Nakagawa employs another recycled photographic idea: linking the past to present and the future.  Using his father’s memory box and the power of digital software, Nakagawa constructs a futuristic building in his photograph out of a past he describes as unfamiliar.  I’ve seen countless permutations of this idea and I never like it.

{ 17 comments }

SL May 1, 2009 at 5:54 pm

I hear photography is dead.

SL May 1, 2009 at 12:54 pm

I hear photography is dead.

jen May 1, 2009 at 6:12 pm

long live painting.

jen May 1, 2009 at 1:12 pm

long live painting.

Ian Aleksander Adams May 1, 2009 at 6:21 pm

To be fair, there are also some extremely deserving Guggenheim fellows this year.

Ian Aleksander Adams May 1, 2009 at 1:21 pm

To be fair, there are also some extremely deserving Guggenheim fellows this year.

mbr May 1, 2009 at 1:38 pm

thanks you.. was thinking the same thing

mbr May 1, 2009 at 6:38 pm

thanks you.. was thinking the same thing

Gregg Evans May 4, 2009 at 5:54 pm

I mean, for every Osamu James Nakagawa etc. there is still Brian Ulrich, who totally makes up for both of those duds.

Gregg Evans May 4, 2009 at 12:54 pm

I mean, for every Osamu James Nakagawa etc. there is still Brian Ulrich, who totally makes up for both of those duds.

Art Fag City May 4, 2009 at 5:56 pm

I don’t buy that. Why not just choose 7 good photographers? I know they exist.

Art Fag City May 4, 2009 at 12:56 pm

I don’t buy that. Why not just choose 7 good photographers? I know they exist.

Brian May 5, 2009 at 7:19 pm

Damn, Paddy thanks for the un-mention.
In defense of these two these examples are most likely not what they submitted in their application. I know for certain in James’ case.

Brian May 5, 2009 at 2:19 pm

Damn, Paddy thanks for the un-mention.
In defense of these two these examples are most likely not what they submitted in their application. I know for certain in James’ case.

Derek May 13, 2009 at 6:35 am

I don’t think you can judge James’ body of work from those examples. I find the work he plans to do in Okinawa very interesting and unique.

Derek May 13, 2009 at 6:35 am

I don’t think you can judge James’ body of work from those examples. I find the work he plans to do in Okinawa very interesting and unique.

Derek May 13, 2009 at 1:35 am

I don’t think you can judge James’ body of work from those examples. I find the work he plans to do in Okinawa very interesting and unique.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: